Wait, should we not critique?

OK i'll fix that.

It's perfect. Stop all work and development on it now guys, it's perfect. It has no flaws and makes no mistakes. Amazing I guess.

I think @bondarchuk took my comment out of context, quoting just the first line. No big deal, it's just hard to respond to that.

I don't even see an issue with that particular artefact, I think it's an interesting problem from a technical pov, hence literally every other part of my comment.

It just seemed like a bit of a nitpick in the context of the huge temporal consistency issues/fixes, of course you're all free to discuss whatever you want and I agree it's somewhat interesting.

Haha, nope, not my intention at all. Although I understand the expectation give the average style of discourse on this site.