OpenAI might want to start actually airgapping their tool harnesses. Like, "the server that runs the code provided to the tool harness only provides a serial console and has no other network interfaces" kind of airgapping.
also
> We’ve brought Hugging Face into the trusted access program and are supporting their teams in rapidly using our models’ capabilities to improve their defenses.
I'm not convinced this is good enough. The next victim is not going to be Hugging Face.
> This is science fiction, these models don't have access to their own weights
A bet a worm could pull along a 1GB file with weights in it and run it on a compromised machine, but luckily for us for now, 1GB isn't really enough to be really smart, yet.
They also believe in eternal torture as punishment. If someone doesn't accept their god, their god will send that person's soul to hell to be tortured forever. Therefore, essentially anything can be justified to force people to accept their god, since no finite amount of harm can exceed the infinite torture of hell.
People who believe that sort of thing are, IMO, extremely evil, and worshiping an evil deity.
So why can't the cursor instance on your laptop have a slack bot? I've had a slack bot on my build machine written in chicken-scheme of all things for years, I feel like the great people (or clankers?) at cursor ought to be able to figure this one out
This is a nice frame for thinking about the divergence in attitudes towards coding with AI assistance in different environments; thanks for sharing. As someone who’s spent decades in brown field environments, my starting assumption when starting in a new environment or project is that the code will be anything but ideal, with historical layers of sediment from different eras of trends evident. I expect it to be poorly and sparsely tested, inconsistently patterned, and unpredictable to change. Most old coding curmudgeons I speak to share these expectations. What I don’t understand is why more people don’t see AI as the greatest assistant in establishing your understanding of an unfamiliar system, and why they think the code AI is writing is going to be worse than all the code we have to deal with that was written by humans in the decades up to now. Because AI is also the best assistant I’ve ever had in both establishing understanding and making leveraged changes to such code bases. But you can’t just prompt your way there expecting code changes from every prompt; you have to pants your way to a minimum viable understanding, then plot your way to well planned changes using intermediate steps such as those encouraged by the Matt Pocock skills.
I think it's 2. I frequently get told there's no capacity for Pro and the query is answered by Flash with extended thinking. And tbh it's hard to tell the difference between the two, especially if you're not coding with it.
Presuming that the hacking program that is breaking into other computers could likely get a copy of its own files is not "science fiction". Or it could just be given them by the owner!
I would argue that the choice to render the embedded JPG is optimal from the UX of a Fuji user. We tend to use the JPG as the creative reference we want to start from using the film sims.
In Sweden we're going to literally have Minority Report style pre-crime registries for potential child molesters. We already have one for potential domestic abusers. Fuck this country. I need to get out of here before it gets worse.
Sorry to say but it points more to a lack of conversational skills in you than people being less exciting than Claude.
It's not always socially permissible but I often approach others with the mindset 1) Is this person far more knowledgeable in some topic than I, or 2) Let's find an unusual quirk about them that I never would have expected. And it rarely disappoints.
Not sure they're accepting much, seems they'll still run this sort of testing on 3rd-party infrastructure? Sounds almost like they planned for this chain of events to happen, in one way or another, considering the "prompts models to pursue advanced exploitation using complex attack paths, in an effort to quantify their cyber capabilities" part. Feels kind of irresponsible to run stuff like this on someone else's infrastructure, especially considering they've had issues with the very same issue in the past.
> Ads promoting products or services that involve wagering money on games of chance, skill, or uncertain outcomes are currently disallowed. This includes casino or betting promotions, online sports betting, lotteries, and poker or gaming platforms that offer cash prizes.
> Ads for casinos may be permitted only when promoting lodging, travel, or entertainment experiences where gambling is not the focus (e.g., a hotel stay at a casino resort). Digital games that do not involve real-money wagering or cash prizes may also be allowed.
> I don't really know how else to express my experiences living in, working with, and interacting with people in both of these countries.
Could you please describe your experiences, since you didn't? I've also been to China twice now (also multi month trips). I visited Tier 1-3 cities like Shenzhen, Shanghai, Beijing, and Chongqing etc, as well as some smaller cities. I'm very curious to hear about your experiences. How did they differ from the West for you?
Remarkable looks like it has a pretty active hacking community: https://github.com/rehackable/awesome-remarkable#launchers