I think @bondarchuk took my comment out of context, quoting just the first line. No big deal, it's just hard to respond to that.
I don't even see an issue with that particular artefact, I think it's an interesting problem from a technical pov, hence literally every other part of my comment.
It just seemed like a bit of a nitpick in the context of the huge temporal consistency issues/fixes, of course you're all free to discuss whatever you want and I agree it's somewhat interesting.
I don't even see an issue with that particular artefact, I think it's an interesting problem from a technical pov, hence literally every other part of my comment.