> browsers should drop support for unencrypted HTTP soon after Let's Encrypt goes live.
To the people who keep insisting everything needs encryption: No it doesn't. Fuck off!
You don't see me forcing PGP on on your email, do you? No? Fine, then let us non-weirdoes keep using plain HTTP where we want it, where we have determined that it is a good fit for our needs.
Besides, this is purely a theoretical concern because a browser which drops support for plain HTTP wont have any user-base as soon people discover that 95% of the internet will broken when using that browser.
> You don't see me forcing PGP on on your email, do you?
Not pgp (as in, not end-to-end encryption). But hopefully in most cases you are forced to encrypt your email (smtp/tls), servers forwarding your email are likely using encryption (smtp/tls between servers), and you're pulling the email over encrypted channel (imaps). Alternatively your mail submission/collection goes over https to the email provider.
And yes, I will insist on everyone using encryption in mail, web, everything. Because once you actually want to use it for some reason, you don't want it to be completely different from all your other traffic, basically screaming "hey, I'm trying to hide some data here, because all my other connections are in plaintext".
Fortunately we're at the stage where everyone is actually forced to use encryption for a lot of their traffic.
So, is the problem encryption or manual encryption ?
I presume you don't care about encryption when you send emails, and yet if you're using a big name your emails will be encrypted without you even knowing it.
That's why I keep wanting to put "automatic" encryption everywhere, and would rather have your browser demote plain HTTP as insecure as a TLS connection with RC4-MD5, and display good security connection with a higher "indicator" than those, even if the certificate is self-signed (yet not as high as a trusted communication)
In practice that would mean "this connection is PROBABLY secure. If you really care about what you're about to do, STOP NOW. If you don't care just go on".
"Automatic" PGP (or really E2E encryption) would be awesome, but there is still far too much manual work for it to happen. Maybe one day we'll be there.
I assume you use telnet instead of ssh too. Once you do a little research and spend a little time figuring out what can actually be done (and is done constantly) to the unencrypted HTTP (anything from user tracking, to ad injections, to identity theft), you will realize just how wrong you are. Yes, HTTP needs to die. Sorry it's taking you a while to see it.
To the people who keep insisting everything needs encryption: No it doesn't. Fuck off!
You don't see me forcing PGP on on your email, do you? No? Fine, then let us non-weirdoes keep using plain HTTP where we want it, where we have determined that it is a good fit for our needs.
Besides, this is purely a theoretical concern because a browser which drops support for plain HTTP wont have any user-base as soon people discover that 95% of the internet will broken when using that browser.