2. The game was limit holdem, which is easier for a computer to solve than no-li... | Hacker News

Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		aidanf on Dec 4, 2007 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Matt Maroon: Why I Quit Playing Poker For A Livin... 2. The game was limit holdem, which is easier for a computer to solve than no-limit.

mattmaroon on Dec 6, 2007 [–]

I'm pretty sure it's much harder when heads up.

aidanf on Dec 10, 2007 | [–]

Limit is definitely easier to solve in a standard ring game. Why would limit be more difficult to solve than no-limit heads up?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact