it was slightly different: Anybody who wanted to try implementing a gil-less pyt... | Hacker News

HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		LBarret on Feb 12, 2014 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Toward Go 1.3 it was slightly different: Anybody who wanted to try implementing a gil-less python could. The reasons of the status-quo were well explained. We only get hand-waving from the Go core devs.

ithkuil on Feb 12, 2014 [–]

Adding generics to the language affects the language and reimplementing an interpreter/compiler for a language that fixes a performance issue without being incompatible are two completely different things.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact