I agree with your parent and thus don't want you in charge of "running the medical system," either. But we don't have to have one or the other. You buy your insurance policy that covers whatever it takes to save your fetus and I'll buy my policy that doesn't (and spend the difference on improving the lives of my healthy children).
Failure to think critically about how to value life results in harmful abortion and euthanasia laws and is contributing to the high cost/benefit ratios of our healthcare system. We have quite enough people thinking only emotionally about these issues.
This is pretty obviously preferable to the situation we have in health care today in the U.S., where you're (more or less) forced to get employment and health insurance from the same company.
No it doesn't - these are not mutually exclusive choice. How are expenses for US health care and aid to foreign countries related? You could just as well budget the money for the latter against the expense for a coffee, an aircraft carrier or Armstrong's salary.
I totally agree that health care is too expensive at the moment.
Consider who you're talking about when you say, "The cost of replacing the thing".