HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hotel law was absolutely created to regulate people renting out their places. The early working-class hotels were owner-occupied tenements with short leases. Hotel regulation was written with that picture in mind.

And I simply cannot believe you compared hotel regulation to the institution of slavery. It is not just in-apt, it is totally inappropriate. You should feel ashamed of yourself.



Some states (I know Illinois) actually have laws protecting renting out your own place. Typically referred to as subleasing.

Also, get off your high horse.


Subleasing is legally protected in New York. Operating an illegal hotel is not.


Please provide a reference to your claim about hotel law being created to regulate early working-class hotels. I can't find any. And given that NY only recently modified hotel law to ban less-than-30-days rentals on SROs, what you say is hard to believe.

I should be ashamed for making a factual comment? Slavery is only shocking now, but it was completely normal a few hundred years ago and for thousands of years before that. Would you prefer I compare hotel law to gay marriage then? The principle is the same anyway, people believe or agree on something until the premise for that is no longer acceptable or no longer true. Then a debate starts and change must happen. You are rejecting change and accusing the people who are creating the change of being criminals, I think you should be ashamed of that.

Given your nickname and the tone of your comments, I recommend you read this and put it into practice: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/3304496/Be-lucky-its-a...


Slavery is only shocking now

This is utter bullshit. There have people making political stands against slavery for centuries. In the US, there were laws being brought in in 1777, right after independence. In England, there was a 16th century case where a slave brought from Russia would not be recognised under English law. Slavery in France was prohibited early in the 14th century.

Slavery has a long tradition of people opposing it. Even 'thousands of years before that', there were societies where slavery was explicitly forbidden. The Achaemenid Empire (500-300BC) banned slavery due to its Zoroastrian religion.


Still, I would think more people are against slavery today than 500 years ago, which was the main point.


I didn't say slavery was accepted by everyone, I said it was normal and that only not it's shocking. I guess I should have said it's only shocking now to most people.

But that is besides the point. I don't want to debate about slavery, and that is not the point of the article, I used slavery only as a contrast to exemplify how people agree or disagree with something, then debate, then come to some agreement.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: