HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Speaking over a video link, the tech billionaire criticised 'uncontrolled migration', later adding: 'Whether you choose violence or not, violence is coming to you. You either fight back or you die.'" https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0m4rz0pvmno.amp

"Elon Musk says 'civil war is inevitable' as UK rocked by far-right riots." https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/06/tech/elon-musk-civil-war-uk-r...

"Elon Musk calls for dissolution of parliament at far-right rally in London" https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/sep/13/elon-musk...

"Musk reposted meme saying people who benefit from federal programs are the 'Parasite Class'" https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-musk-reposted-meme-120...

Calls to violence and illegal action, dehumanization, demands for exclusion, rejection of individual rights and constitutional order -- oh yes. All of the above. These are his Twitter-brain-rotted bread and butter.

Also, did I say we should arrest Elon Musk for hate speech? I said that inflammatory white supremacist rhetoric viscerally disgusts me, as does using a social platform owned by a white supremacist, and I want none of my attention or money going to any of his warped enterprises. This is not exactly rocket science and does not require a philosophical dissection.

(I assume you generated your response with an LLM so not sure why I even bother.)



I’m not disputing that Musk says things you find objectionable. I’m pointing out that his statement -- and these statements -- do not cross the thresholds you’re claiming they do. Yours is a claim of moral contamination, not an argument. Thresholds don’t matter, refutation doesn’t matter, and context doesn’t matter.

Nothing you’ve quoted here meets the content thresholds you've invoked: no call to violence or illegal action, no dehumanization, no demand for exclusion, no rejection of individual rights or constitutional order.

This is not, by any logically justifiable standard, "white supremacy".

> (I assume you generated your response with an LLM so not sure why I even bother.)

No, but you would benefit from asking an LLM to analyze your responses for logical entailment before posting them.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: