Interesting. Shame the rebuttal contains no references, whereas Dyson's is littered with them.
Though - the idea that global climate change, even if it ends up making the world a better place, will undoubtedly lead to tension and possibly even war, is almost axiomatic, and something Dyson glossed over.
If you mean littered as in spread randomly and being worthless then sure. Plenty of massive assertions in that Dyson's piece with no facts, no figures and no cites.
Though - the idea that global climate change, even if it ends up making the world a better place, will undoubtedly lead to tension and possibly even war, is almost axiomatic, and something Dyson glossed over.