Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Interpretations of QM are philosophy. That's why there's no consensus regarding them, unlike the underlying equations.


The ontological status of the equations is still unclear. BTW, if you can provide a link to your own essay, I would be interested :-)


Why assume that someone has written their own essay on such a topic?

After this commemt chain it comes across as both dismissive and arrogant.


Why did I assume someone has written an essay? Because he said so! Quoting:

> I do like his ideas (and I wrote similar things about platonic forms elsewhere)

What is dismissive about my interest to his write-up? (I'm sure it was a misunderstanding on your part, you don't need to apologize :-))




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: