Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There's nothing to "fall for". Do you have specific evidence that refutes Espressif's rationale for why they believe it's not a security issue. No, a flawed car analogy doesn't count.

If you can break into the application running on an ESP32, you already have full access to RAM etc. The debug HCI commands will not give you any extra access.

Yes, security researchers are incentivized to make issues seem like more of a problem than they are, and vendors are incentivized to minimize them. In this case, though, the reality is much closer to Espressif's version.



I'm old school. I know those boards won't run virtualized unsafe code* but I still like to know what can fiddle with memory behind my back.

* as we assumed with sbcs like raspberypi earlier...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: