Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think it’s still largely subjective and depends on the user.

For instance I find the multimonitor situation on Windows entirely unserviceable and far worse than what macOS has going. Its inability to have separate sets of virtual desktops per monitor or to switch desktops on each monitor independently is just embarrassing… macOS has had this since the mid-00s and Linux DEs even earlier. On my Macs I just assign apps to their respective desktops and everything is smooth sailing.

As for app installation, disk images are a bit weird it’s true, but I’ll take copying an app package to /Applications/ over running an install wizard or script that wants admin priveleges and is doing goodness knows what. If I were in Apple’s shoes I’d take that bit further and require binary packages for end-user-facing applications to be entirely self-contained, with an exception made for ~/Library/Application Support/<appname>/ which they can use to downloading plugins, scratch space, etc.

Hiding menu items behind key presses isn’t optimal but between the extremes of overloading menus with less-used items or eliminating menus entirely (The GNOME Way™) I’ll take it.






Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: