Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

But why would that mean that the people who didn't suppress died so much younger?



> [A]ccording Chris McManus, the researchers made a "very subtle error"...

> Halpern and Coren took a list of the people who had recently died and contacted their families, asking whether or not their relative had been right- or left-handed.

> Looking at 2,000 cases, they saw that the average age at death of the left-handers was about nine years younger than of the right-handers.

> On that basis, they concluded that left-handers died earlier.

> At first glance, that seems persuasive. What did the researchers do wrong?

> "Their mistake was that they only looked at the dead," Chris McManus explains.

> The point is that left-handers are more common now than they used to be, so - at least at the time the research was published - left-handers were on average younger than right-handers.

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-23988352




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: