Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Stolen, thanks! I just played around with something like that in vim¹, and it works great.

I have a tooling issue with your method, perhaps in the same manner as you feel about C-i. To me "italicize $count previous words" makes far more sense than expanding the region on repeated calls. Although to be fair I can wrap over visual mode for that functionality which would feel more comfortable to me; "ge" end of previous word, "v", $navigation, ...

My point - to the extent I have one - is that there is probably a degree of personal comfort that colors our reactions to people using C-i.

¹ Basically "imap <C-S-8> <Esc>bcw*<C-r>-*<C-o>w". I'll give it some more thought, along with adding v:count and non-* support, before it hits my vimrc.



awesome! i look forward to hearing how you end up doing it




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: