It sounds like there's no good review process for these; if they lack substance or are too long, they should never be published. But I take it that the people responsible for the people writing these also get the benefits?
There is a review process, but "yes, your comments are relevant, but they're just nit picking, can you just approve it so that we can start working on this project?"
It feels like this case where when people are reviewing each other they might feel incentivised to be easy on each other in agreement so that both would get the promo easier, especially if they both think the doc is just for show to get the promo.
Am I going to be a difficult person here finding each and single flaw about the doc or should I just allow it, let the other person get more visibility and just move on with my work. Why should I be a bottleneck here for a pointless battle.
