Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From the report: 16% were problematic, AKA they could not determine with enough precision if they were junk. The remaining 6% didn't publish enough information to even assess them.

So yes, they are also junk.



I came here to confirm that I hadn't missed something in the article. Thanks for confirming.

This is so fucked up...


I'm not surprised the pioneers of this was Enron after all.


That is incredible. I just assumed the other 22% were not junk but it’s actually worse than the title implies.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: