I would stop brute force testing simply by putting a limit on it.
As far as I know there are some pretty standard procedures you have to go through. Surely it must be possible to somehow validate and verify whether someone is trying to take advantage.
You can't hinder some taking advantage of it, but you don't have to IMO.
>I doute they cool do that.
Of course they can, just like then can improve many other areas in public service.
>I agree its not very good right know but I don't know how to change it.
Well I for one think its more fair to accept some fraud to make it cheaper for everyone else if possible of course.
As far as I know there are some pretty standard procedures you have to go through. Surely it must be possible to somehow validate and verify whether someone is trying to take advantage.
You can't hinder some taking advantage of it, but you don't have to IMO.
>I doute they cool do that.
Of course they can, just like then can improve many other areas in public service.
>I agree its not very good right know but I don't know how to change it.
Well I for one think its more fair to accept some fraud to make it cheaper for everyone else if possible of course.