That was Rumblefish, not Youtube. Youtube was a *victim* of that, since they cou... | Hacker News

Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

icebraining on March 4, 2012 | parent | context | favorite | on: StackOverflow

That was Rumblefish, not Youtube. Youtube was a victim of that, since they could've made more money by simply putting the ads and not sharing them with Rumblefish.

SideburnsOfDoom on March 4, 2012 [–]

And we're back here: http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=3659864

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact