Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Regulated for what? For spending the highest amount of R&D per Revenue to further improve an insanely complicated field of technology, much more so than CPU or GPU but no one understand, not being talked about, not hyped up, and no media knows anything about?

It is worth pointing out Qualcomm isn't just sitting here doing nothing and collecting money. That is the narrative Apple's PR spend years trying to put a spin on. When it was Steve Jobs himself who first put a high value on Qualcomm's patent. May be preciously because he understand the value Qualcomm has to offer. And even at the time Tim Cook was unhappy about putting another $7 on COGS.



> Regulated for what?

For monopolizing the technology that became standardized, and thus required, for all of modern communications.

"Boo hoo, they spent good money for all those patents to make sure they were the only ones you could turn to to make these things!"

They've been wiping their tears away with the stacks of money they charge every single hardware manufacturer for access to that technology for far too long now, including very clearly breaching the spirit of FRAND at least in their dealings with Apple, based on the hard facts that came out with that case.


>For monopolizing the technology that became standardized, and thus required, for all of modern communications.

In that case every single one of the patents holding are "monopolizing" the technology. ( No that is not monopolizing means ). That is including Ericsson, Nokia, Samsung and LG. I am not even counting ZTE and Huawei here.

> based on the hard facts that came out with that case.

Hard facts? You mean charging Apple double the amount of the next total six patent holder?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: