Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Strongest plausible interpretation doctrine would have you read this as "any git-accessible self contained minimal samples available"?


But feeding into a proprietary product isn’t good for us. Using Google and Photoshop as verbs isn’t great as is, but Git by its nature as a DVCS it becomes even more important we don’t have our language drift in a way that centralizes. Specifying that it is Git is even of questionable value.

“Are there any samples with the source available“ is a better phrasing (minimal and self-contained aren't implied by naming a platform).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: