What questions does it raise about my motives? Please ask the questions explicitly and I will address them, because although it reads like I should be offended in some way, I can't figure out what exactly you seem to be implying. Maybe I'm a paid shill for some wikipedia competitor?
It's hard for me to intentionally misrepresent the discussion since I refuse to visit the page from work because I don't want an image of a naked woman on my computer screen at work.
There are arguments there that say "hey, that's unnecessary, distracting, and this picture that would not be construed as inappropriate for work or school suits the article just as well". I don't recall what "the later 3 images" refers to. Assuming it was support of the naked image (because otherwise, you've presented no support of rational argument in favor of it), it supports my point: saying that people should not consider it vulgar is not a legitimate response to "we should not unnecessarily alienate users who may be uncomfortable accessing a site with unexpected naked women"
It's hard for me to intentionally misrepresent the discussion since I refuse to visit the page from work because I don't want an image of a naked woman on my computer screen at work.
There are arguments there that say "hey, that's unnecessary, distracting, and this picture that would not be construed as inappropriate for work or school suits the article just as well". I don't recall what "the later 3 images" refers to. Assuming it was support of the naked image (because otherwise, you've presented no support of rational argument in favor of it), it supports my point: saying that people should not consider it vulgar is not a legitimate response to "we should not unnecessarily alienate users who may be uncomfortable accessing a site with unexpected naked women"