Yes. Over time they've balanced out their reporting by at least acknowledging legitimate uses of tax havens, and even going as far to point out that it is probably the predominate use of tax havens - compliant to all countries involved. But their headlines still lead their readers towards assuming impropriety. And now that they bother to acknowledge the existence of legitimate uses, given the ongoing criticism from anybody educated in the financial sector, they don't bother with the advantages or "the why". They could educate, but choose to only raise awareness towards the assumption of guilt for using leading and competitive jurisdictions. They just instigate populist sentiment and make a tally of the few people adversely affected due to the populist sentiment after being doxxed, alongside the different and fewer people that actually broke their country's laws.

Well, just because it's not breaking laws doesn't mean the use of tax havens has positive benefits for society which ,I guess, is the point of these ICIJ investigations - to eventually change laws.