I could, but it would materially change my outlook for a comfortable/safe future.
It wouldn't for the super rich. That's kinda the point.
Me: I could help people, but it would weaken my future outlook
The Super Rich: Could help many people and they would never notice
The fact that someone who could never be be materially affected by improving the lives of others (for instance, treating warehouse staff better), but doesn't, is the key here.
No, there are people you could save for a couple dollars a day. It won't affect your life either.
It's the exact same thing. You're continuing with the hypocrisy.
When you can answer honestly why you don't do that, you'll have an idea why the super rich also don't do that. There's not just one reason, and maybe the answer makes you uncomfortable when you weigh your justifications against the value of a human life. But it is what it is.
It wouldn't for the super rich. That's kinda the point.
Me: I could help people, but it would weaken my future outlook
The Super Rich: Could help many people and they would never notice
The fact that someone who could never be be materially affected by improving the lives of others (for instance, treating warehouse staff better), but doesn't, is the key here.