Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Pretty much my view as well. If Linux becomes incompatible with ZFS in any way, I'll switch to FreeBSD.

That said, after the Oracle Java debacle, I can see why Linus would not be receptive towards merging ZFS into the kernel. I just wish he argued the point on legal issues alone instead of making up stories about non-existent technical flaws in ZFS. The whole thing is basically a work of art. Oracle should consider GPL-ing it and integrating it into Linux directly.



I have been using FreeBSD for its better ZFS support for years, and it's great. Highly recommended.


Same here. I immediately ditched Solaris (hated it) for Linux when KQ Infotech ported ZFS over about a decade ago, but after a few years switched all my file servers to FreeBSD. ZFS > Linux. Did I mention I love Linux?


FreeBSD has been using the ZFS on Linux code for a while.


Not true, not yet.


Thanks for the correction, they decided to go that route in 2018, seems like it’s not live yet.


> Oracle should consider GPL-ing it and integrating it into Linux directly

I think Apache (or BSD/MIT) would be far more palatable, as GPL'ing it would cut off the BSDs as well as OpenSolaris, which would certainly be a bummer.


Por que no los dos? It's their IP, they can license it under several licenses to maximize adoption. This being Oracle though, I don't think it'll ever happen.


> If Linux becomes incompatible with ZFS in any way, I'll switch to FreeBSD

Isn't FreeBSD now using ZFSOnLinux project as well?


no. see above




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: