Thumb and Thumb2 really aren't any more 'CISC'-y then ARM; about the most cisc aspect would be that thumb2 supports two different instruction lengths (2 and 4 byte) whereas ARM supports only 4 byte instructions.
That said i've heard/read that Thumb2 tends to be the optimum size/space trade-off, but that's not because it's somehow more 'cisc'.
That said i've heard/read that Thumb2 tends to be the optimum size/space trade-off, but that's not because it's somehow more 'cisc'.