> Is that a good summary of our discussion so far? Hrm, I wouldn't say so, and I... | Hacker News

Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		asdfasgasdgasdg on June 16, 2019 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: There is no general AI: Why Turing machines cannot... > Is that a good summary of our discussion so far? Hrm, I wouldn't say so, and I don't think if that is your impression that it's going to be very productive to continue it. FWIW: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

YeGoblynQueenne on June 16, 2019 [–]

Yes, I'm aware of the guidelines, thank you. They are not a tool to passive-aggressively end conversations by accusing other commenters of bad faith.

But I agree this is not a productive conversation. I don't see that you have a very clear idea of what you are trying to say.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact