> judgment and sentencing of some other person has very different standards of proof and process.
If this other party is known to many unrelated people over numerous past events for that pattern of behavior, it seems like fair game to me. People out there already know; it's just "connecting the doxx" for the rest.
That might make sense, for where you, or the writer, are located.
I'm in the US, and we have ideals (not always respected) about due process, and systems to support that.
You might want to consider: how much proof did you actually have when you called for doxxing, and how easy would it be for an adversary to manufacture that amount of proof?
Also, it seems that doxxing tends to result in people with the worst judgment taking vigilante action first, so the standard for doxxing must consider that.
Please don't. What you're referring to doing is a snowball that routinely can (and does) roll out of control. The internet would be a marginally better place if it didn't turn into mob retaliation at every outrage incident.
We can hear someone's report of a terrible experience, and think about the problem, and provide support to that person.
However, judgment and sentencing of some other person has very different standards of proof and process.