HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They will also continue to exist because we have been conditioned that the whole internet will cease to exist without them and that ad blocking is "stealing" which is immoral and wrong.


Ad blocking is immoral and wrong. Loading a website with ads has an implicit agreement: I will give you my product (website content) if, in exchange, you agree load these ads.

If you don't want to see ads on a given site, your moral option is to stop visiting the site.

Glad we finally resolved that once and for all. /s


No it is not. It is my browser, coming into my house. Prove to me you are not doing something creepy with the data, being annoying, and providing value back in your ads and I will decide to quit blocking you.


An implicit agreement isn't an agreement at all. there were no terms, was no negotiation, just an expectation projected by the website creator.


What about setting my hostfile to block sites that are known to track me? I'm not explicitly "blocking ads", just "blocking tracking", but a side-effect of this will invariably be that ads are blocked? Is it immoral?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: