HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Argumentum ad Gödel" ... How would you prove it's a fallacy?

(If you take Gödel seriously, then you can't take Gödel seriously, in which case he's correct and you must take Gödel seriously, &c.)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: