> But be careful not to be too obvious about it, because that makes you a target.
Good. It's probably better that a young curmudgeonly asshole like myself that has zero respect for unquestioned authority go through the years long process of bringing a clear case of 4th and 5th amendment violations through to the supreme court.
I personally would rather rot in jail in contempt if it meant that these questions of personal property, privacy and self-incrimination were discussed and settled legally. It's a question of civic duty at that point.
> ... Once the amount of risk is determined, consider cost, time, and effort of implementing OPSEC countermeasures to mitigate risk. Factors to consider include:
> (1) The benefit and the effect of the countermeasure on reducing risk to the mission.
> (2) The cost of the proposed countermeasure compared with the cost associated with the impact if the adversary exploited the vulnerability.
> (3) The possibility that the countermeasure could create an OPSEC indicator.
