when it comes to some diets, some only work if you follow them wholeheartedly, like meat only diet, one speck of peppar might be enough to cause an inflammation. But generally you can't take a process that worked well for another person or company and apply it on you or your company. Like for example a training program, you can't just take a training program from a professional athlete and reuse it on your kid and expect him/her to become as good as the pro. Programs and processes are very individual tailored.

I'm pretty sure a religiously followed meat only diet can't succeed at anything other than achieving scurvy.

Meat have all vitamins. But if you plan to stay on the diet forever you should eat all parts, not just the steak.

Ah, fair enough.

I still doubt that your average person would see any real health benefits from eating only meat, even if they ate enough organ meats to actually get all their vitamins and minerals (the lack of fiber is a particular concern) but I guess you're right that there's a version of an "all meat died" that doesn't promptly kill you through malnutrition, you got me there.

A process that fails when you slightly diverge is process that fails. Because all human orgs diverge from stated process here or there. Including army which puts huge amounts of resources into making people comply with everything.

Could ask new users to send an email on a generated temp adress before sending the confirm e-mail. I do think e-mail should be not only opt-in, but also optional!

I find irony in that Git was made to get rid of central repos, and then we re-introduce them.

That is what we have been doing for quite some time now, from what I gathered. Every time I see something becoming popular, I am like "Hmm, I've seen this before", and I really have. They just gave it a fancier name with a fancier logo and did some marketing and there you go, old is new.

I love working for those companies also, where they are used to waiting months for a small software update and I can do it in hours and they think I'm a wizard.

Changing social class has always been very difficult. The solution is to get rid of social classes. Or at least try to even out the difference between the lowest class and highest class.

> Changing social class has always been very difficult

It's been very difficult in part because 150+ years of Marxist tradition has not been able to define what a class is. Upwards social mobility by other metrics such as wealth and income, both intra- and inter-generation, is actually provable and real.

I'm currently experimenting with running a web app "headless" in Node.JS by implementing some of the DOM JS functions myself. Then write mocks for keyboard input, etc. Then have the code agent run the headless client which also starts the tests. In my experience the coding agents are very bad at detecting UX issues, they can however write the tests for me if I explain what's wrong. So I'm the eye's and it's my taste, the agent writes the tests and the code.

Programming is an abstraction of the machine code which describe what the computer should do. You could in theory program in prose, meaning the description of the program compiles into an app.

Also if something is fun, we prefer to to it that way instead of the boring way. Then it depends on how many mines you step on, after a while you try to avoid the mines. That's when your productivity goes down radically. If we see something shiny we'll happily run over the minefield again though.

This is starting to look like the emperors new clothes.

If you want to upset people on the internet tell them that JavaScript is strongly typed, immutable, and everything is passed by value. Which is true. You can change member values though, which is the footgun.