I liked Daemon and completely missed Freedom. Thanks for the pointer.

Oh, wow, enjoy!

The difference if you can film out on the street (random people walking by) or just your property (my own fault if I approach your door).

Some countries have laws for this, as in you can only point the camera so that you don't catch everyone. This can have downsides, e.g. if you have no (even short) front yard and your (organization's) door is directly on the curb - but I completely agree that this is just tough luck, the privacy of random people walking on public property past private property should not be filmed.

Can confirm, used Botan in the past and I didn't curse at it a lot. Certainly less than OpenSSL.

Same here. Clan wars on the ESL, visiting people for LAN parties, all around a good time.

I have OpenBSD running on my old 2004 Centrino notebook (I might be lagging 2-3 versions behind, I don't really use it, just play around with it) and it's fine until you start playing YouTube videos, that is kinda hard on the CPU.

Yes, NetBSD and OpenBSD work fine on the 2005 T42 but as you say video performance is low. Recent OpenBSD versions have had to reduce the range of binary packages (i.e. outside of the base and installed with pkg_add) on i386 because of the difficulty of compiling them (e.g. Firefox, Seamonkey needing dependencies that are hard to compile on i386, a point the poster up thread made).

My ~/yt-dlp.conf:

    #inicio de fichero
    --format=bestvideo[height<=?480][fps<=?30]+bestaudio/best
     #fin de fichero

My ~/.config/mpv/config

#inicio

      ytdl-format=bestvideo[height<=?480][fps<=?30]+bestaudio/best
      ao=sndio
      vo=gpu,xv
      audio-pitch-correction=no
      quiet=yes
      pause=no
      profile=fast
      vd-lavc-skiploopfilter=all
      #demuxer-cache-wait=yes
     #demuxer-max-bytes=4MiB
     #fin

Usage: mpv $YOUTUBE_URL

Upgrade ASAP.

Not as elaborate a story, but in a former office we had special office chair that, when you sat down with a bit of force it would switch off one or two specific monitors.

That also took a few minutes to debug why this one coworker came back from lunch, plummeted down into his chair, and someone else's screen went out.

I have relatively good experience with both Rust and Go here. It still works and maybe you need update 2-3 dependencies that released an incompatible version, but it's not all completely falling apart just because you went on a vacation (looking at you npm)

I get 16% deduction for having text links (no js, no embeds) to twitter and facebook, one each.

Thanks for reminding me to remove these, but "how dependent your website is on Non-EU services." is just 100% wrong here.

edit: ok, I saw someone else also posted that.

edit2: OK, another page where I have a ton of youtube embeds (but all behind some JS to show a static image before you click) gets 94% - that page is actually, 100% useless without youtube.

Hey wink ()

true. some socialmedia was too aggressive - should be resolved.

for yt: i tried to fix the lazy-loaded YouTube detection. Tool now catches: - iframes with data-src - web components: <lite-youtube>, <lite-youtube-embed>, <youtube-video>, <lite-vimeo>, <lite-vimeo-embed>, <vimeo-video>

One thing I stumbled over: if YT-URL only lives inside a JS variable and gets injected on click with no trace in the HTML. That's a static analysis limitation.

And: React facades that load a YouTube thumbnail → already detected. React facades that use a local/self-hosted placeholder image with only a video ID in a data attribute → not detected.

You mind sharing a URL so I can verify it works against your site?

Thanks for helping already!

Hey, unfortunately I don't have an url for you but a paste:

https://topaz.github.io/paste/#XQAAAQB5AgAAAAAAAAAQaIsMhpPLj...

> Now, Scala ranks below Elixir, a quite esoteric and narrow-specialized language

I find Scala very esoteric, jftr :)

> You can even see Typescript or Python as backend languages, mainly in the startup area.

"even" "mainly" - I wonder if the author has ever worked anywhere else than... a bank or similar cliche work places.

> In 2023, 52.3% of the respondents wanted to use Scala.

What.. are these numbers? Sure that's not "52.3% of Scala developers"?

I have one of these and it was really nice in the first 1-n years.

People gamified it and then it sucked, but the idea wasn't so bad. One would expect people would not stoop this low for a free T-Shirt.

There is no limit to how low someone will stoop to get even a tiny token for free. I remember a local community fun event from a couple of years ago, which was set up by the library to encourage kids to read. They would count up these reading tokens at the end of it and give some tiny $2 teddy bear to the winners, and of course a bunch of adults swooped in, gamed the system, and all the toys went to them. People are totally shameless assholes when even an insignificant free prize is on the line.