Found this site online, the cookie banner ruins the experience. Tap on it to make it go away.

Hey HN,

Smart Bulk Renamer can bulk rename your local & cloud files. For now, Google Drive, Dropbox & OneDrive are supported.

Local file renaming works only on Chromium-based browsers because they can handle local files using the FileSystemHandle.move API [1].

Smart Bulk Renamer is heavily inspired by the Mac app "Name Mangler" [2].

You can try it without creating an account, and I’d love to hear your feedback!

[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/FileSystemH... [2] https://manytricks.com/namemangler/

Is it made using super.so?

yes

I can understand your concern. But, I need to comply with Google APIs Terms of Service. https://developers.google.com/terms#b_confidential_matters

> You will keep your credentials confidential and make reasonable efforts to prevent and discourage other API Clients from using your credentials. Developer credentials may not be embedded in open source projects

That’s a fair point, I forgot you had to use a token on your end too to make the flow work; thanks for your reply.

Sure. Without open-source projects, I would not have been able to build Radar. So, I wanted to give something back for the incredible work open-source maintainers are doing out there. Hence, the statement.

You will find it on the pricing page when Radar comes out of beta. The only thing I'm confused about is what kind of criteria I have to set before giving a free license to the person who wants to claim the offer? I'd appreciate it much if any of you guys can help set the criteria.

> How about a $0 starter tier for max. of x monitors, with a max freq. of every y hrs... then move up to a one-time fee that is more generous, but still constrained, and finally have a monthly fee that allows unlimited.

Yeah! That seems like a nice strategy. Do you think people will be ready to pay subscription for unlimited access?

I would MUCH prefer a subscription personally.

I think you would be the exception. In fact, you may the only person I’ve ever heard express this preference.

The problem with a one-time-fee for a cloud service is that it's unsustainable. That's why I suggest OP have constraints on accounts unless paying a subscription fee. If you really find a 3rd party cloud service (requiring servers/networking/bandwidth) valuable, you should assist in its survival. The fee should be nominal (unless real support is included) but non-zero.

I agree, and that's why, although you maybe thought somewhat outrageous, if OP is going down the 1-time path, i'd rather pay a lot in hope that they can keep the cloud services running for years even if they decided to stop working on it. I like your formula approach.

What canada_dry said below. Especially for what seems to be a solo developer, I'd rather this was costed so as even if they decided to stop working on it, the margin per month was such that I could continue to use it for years. I feel like for a solo developer doing a 1 time fee, more likely to disappear after a couple of years

I second this. Most people I know, including myself, would much rather have one time purchase.

I haven't finalised the price. But, it'll be more than $20 for sure.

More than 20 a month, annually? Fixed purchase.

I meant that for a fixed purchase. I'm still contemplating setting up subscription plans.

Then over $20 is definitely ok. I was just surprised thinking it would be +$20 a month! Just downloaded.

Thanks! I will check the issue.

Thanks! I will check it out. Please get in touch using the support link in the landing page so that, I can let you know once I fix the issue.

Sure. Will do that.