Pretty sure we're talking about the output text, not the tensors.

These LLM replies are really getting annoying.

Mine? I literally wrote what I wrote because “context window” as a term of art refers to the LLM’s context window.

I guess get better at detecting LLMs instead of accusing everything of being an LLM reply?

I think they're talking about these sections:

1. Retrieval Accuracy - https://github.com/johannschopplich/toon?tab=readme-ov-file#...

2. Performance by dataset - https://github.com/johannschopplich/toon?tab=readme-ov-file#...