thanks! will be checking out your project as well. if someone is running 5+ agents for different features i recommend just stating them as different objectives of the claude session and just let claude code auto-spawn sub-agents that handle them.
it seems like ai providers are getting better at deciding when to make sub-agents on their own. but i'm actively exploring this and will hopefully have more to report back sooner than later. your approach is cool.
i have found that the agent cli tools running in the panes are more dialed in by having the local directory structure as context and the best streaming text interface to show ai output on. the chat panel is kind of a nice to have as it's familiar. you can highlight text on the terminal > right click > choose Fix This|Explain This and it's sent to the chat panel to dig into more.
it's also, helpful for asking tangential questions about the current claude session, while allowing it to keep running but not interfering with it.
Creator here, happy to answer questions.
A quick demo of the auto-snap workflow: you type 'claude' or 'codex' in any pane, Yaw detects it, and splits — agent on the left, shell in the same directory on the right. When the agent exits, the split closes automatically. It sounds trivial but it removed a surprising amount of friction for me.
I have been on the terraform side for 7 years-ish.
eksctl just really impressed me with its eks management, specifically managed node groups & cluster add-ons, over terraform.
that uses cloudformation under the hood. so i gave it a try, and it’s awesome. combine with github actions and you have your IAC automation.
nice web interface for others to check stacks status, events for debugging and associated resources that were created.
oh, ever destroy some legacy complex (or not that complex) aws shit in terraform? it’s not going to be smooth. site to site connections, network interfaces, subnets, peering connections, associated resources… oh, my.
so far cloudformation has been good at destroying, but i haven’t tested that with massive legacy infra yet.
but i am happily converted tf>cf.
and will happily use both alongside each other as needed.
i can tell you being physically strong comes with it violence and is at the fabric of being an American. so i’d say the issue is complicated and nuanced as is most.
breaking the law (through violence) is also American. we stand up for what we believe in. even if it means breaking the law and going against our government. this is America.
the fact that you have better outcomes for crime is great. how’s your investment system? how’s your sports teams? how’s your military? how’s your stock market? how’s your currency?
I can respect that breaking the law is American, and by all means, go for it.
In general life in Europe is pretty good and could be better, thanks for asking. We can invest, we watch different sports than you do and we don't have a comparable military. The stock market is fine, the currency is fine.
I guess the social media campaign is addressed at those of you, who would like less crime, and who would like rule of law, and less aggression, and a safer lifesytle. To lie to them and tell them that having these things leads to downfall or something.
and i did also say it was complicated and nuanced so please do not ignore that detail of my comment.
i’m glad to hear life is good, and to hear you’re humble enough to acknowledge it could be better. it could be better over here, too. are we doing it right or are you? i have no idea. :)
we’re probably both doing things right and wrong. should it even be solved? are we just living a Memento (great movie) like existence where we’re keeping ourselves busy and at war because if we all got along we would over-populate the planet and destroy earth?
what if our ignorant violent human behavior is actually an environmental mitigation technique?
I don’t think this needs to be solved. We should both strive for what each of us want to have.
Obviously in Europe there will be more variety because there’s more cultures and independent countries.
We have the advantage that we can take good ideas from each other, because people can travel easily and observe that certain things work well.
The US doesn’t have this benefit, since it’s so inward oriented. That’s fine, but don’t go saying Europeans don’t have freedom if you can only look at Europe through the domestic lens.
> We have the advantage that we can take good ideas from each other, because people can travel easily and observe that certain things work well.
True, but, interestingly, we can travel thousands of miles within the United States and in so doing observe that different US states have wildly different outcomes while living under the same federal government and very similar state governments.
Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, and Minnesota live under the same Constitution, the same federal government, and with very similar state governments -- and yet we see that they have very different outcomes on a variety of measures.
Norway and Louisiana have very different crime rates, but so do New Hampshire and Louisiana. This tells us, at a minimum, that the form of government isn't likely to be the primary factor.
student loan debt is out of control. college is a money pit that will hopefully be dissolved within our lifetime. the social aspect is not worth the money.
all knowledge is on the internet. we do not need college at all. that will come to be more evident. but colleges got lots o’ money from donors to prolong their livelihoods.
it seems like ai providers are getting better at deciding when to make sub-agents on their own. but i'm actively exploring this and will hopefully have more to report back sooner than later. your approach is cool.
reply