I have difficulty viewing very thin text, and unfortunately the way Chrome renders common fonts like 10-12pt Arial and Verdana makes me strain my eyes. Firefox and Edge work okay for me.
As a fellow swede I just don't agree with anything you have to say. Outing politicians who are ranting online is fair game as far as I'm concerned. The Sweden Democrats attract racists and their roots are racist, there's just no way to deny that - they mostly follow the same neo-fascist agenda of similar parties throughout Europe.
>Outing politicians who are ranting online is fair game as far as I'm concerned.
I don't see how that has anything to do with that Expressen did to ordinary non-political citizens.
>Expressen har kartlagt chefer, företagare och en docent som hatar anonymt på Avpixlat.
> - Det som ni håller på med är helt avskyvärt. Ni försöker bara hindra folk från att rösta på Sverigedemokraterna, säger Jim Olsson, 67, docent i fysikalisk kemi.
Translation:
>Expressen has researched and tracked managers, entrepreneurs and a docent who hates online at Avpixlat [immigrant focused news site, according to big media a hate-site, my annotation]
>- What you are doing is despicable. You are trying to stop people from voting on the Sweden Democrats, says Jim Olsson, 67, docent in physical chemistry.
Disclaimer: I dont vote nor sympathize with the Sweden Democrats, i just find this gestapo/social-shaming behavior despicable by one of Swedens largest news-papers.
I'm not arguing against anonymity, i am arguing that there is a ethical difference between releasing information about that there's a difference between what a politician says publicly and what the politician really thinks, and the same situation with a private citizen.
A politician wants to change the laws and circumstances for our lives, and he/she gets a mandate to do that by convincing the voters that they have aligned interests.
In this case though it was mostly normal citizens who weren't politicians and they used illegal methods in order to gain personal information about them.
I hoped to find something about "the stack" as in "full stack development" (DB, middleware, frontend etc) because _that_ stack also needs some sorting out.
It's really amazing how all MS-related posts still seem to attract the people wearing tinfooil hats. Not saying there's no truth in there but, you know, just sayin'.
And then there's vagrant. I switched back to MS because C# and profit, all other dev is on vagrant boxes which actually made things easier as I tend to be more comfortable with that what I push will work as I have the same *nix setup on my 127.0.01 as on remote.
Vagrant under VirtualBox is a little slow, but taking the time to set up WinNFSd is very worthwhile for real file I/O gains. If you want to pay for VMWare + VMWare's Vagrant plugin, you'll get even better performance.
Supposedly you can also use Hyper-V which is included by default on Windows 8 and later. But since the time I found that I didn't yet have a need for vagrant again.
I'm currently on Win10 Home, but I use Vagrant so extensively that it's probably worth an upgrade (besides that, it provides a lot of other great features, anyway).
Thanks, I didn't even see that. The site lists 'free' only for a limited featureset (like 10 requests it seems?). That'll let me check it out at least.
V3 may also be suitable for you as well and is completely free BSD/MIT licensed and is supported by a active community on GitHub. V4 is essentially V3 w/about a years extra work on top. Dennis is the creator of ServiceStack and it is now his full-time job, income supports him in implementing features that corporations - like yours - need.
ps. condolences about the "if it's not from microsoft it doesn't exist", there exists many companies with better cultures. Outliers like you are worth their weight in gold.