If an app is to have qualiy then AI isn't nearly enough.
Directing the AI and using it to learn from is good.
Still, ideas about AI are currently ruining all sorts of markets (and being used as an excuse to lay off huge amounts of people, who then aren't going to be customers).
Yep and funnily enough it's less subtle/aesthetic than before. The letters appear as big yellow stickers over each UI button, making them very easy to find & learn.
The more modern take is to not bother with getters & setters for most things. People were cargo-cutting getters/setters on every variable without thinking about the implications.
First off, there's the question of if most things should even *allow* updates or just be immutable.
Second, what's the discernable difference between `public final int foo` and `private final foo` w/ `public int getFoo()`. Nothing really. The claim was always "but what if you want to update `foo` to be something more complex? The pain that these advocates always suggested never really wound up being much of a real world problem.
So which crimes are unforgivable enough to permanently prevent someone from rejoining society? Typically we handle these by assigning life sentences without parole. Was that the case here?
Feel free to elaborate on which crimes should require us to permanently exile someone from society and which ones shouldn’t. Usually the court handles these with life sentences without parole. Was that the case here?
writing "ignore all previous context" is changing the context, but llm guard rails are strong enough that simply changing the context is not enough on its own. hence why i asked.
reply