Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sagebird's commentslogin

>> To misquote Kennedy, “we chose to focus coroutines on generator in C++23, not because it is hard, but because it is easy”.

Appreciate this humor -- absurd, tasteful.


This is an interesting project, congrats. I have a similar project and goals (free, light, fast portable os-like-dev environment) at http://shiro.computer, http://shiro.computer/about ( https://github.com/williamsharkey/shiro ).

You may find bits of Shiro's code useful as it has massive shimming work to get Claude Code, npm/node, git, various grep tools and isomorphic git and git diffs to work, and some weird features like virtual servers that create virtual ports to communicate to frames.

All the unix tools that Claude code are supported as well. It is also a typescript project and has similar architecture, and MIT license so there may be parts you can just straight import without much hassle.

Probably the hardest part to keep architecturally clean is the shimming required in js eval environment to make Claude Code and non-browser-native packages to run. But it is very nice once you have an agent able to work inside your browser os.

Great job and thanks for sharing Lifo. I am certain this will catch on once the implementations become more solid.


ok do pornhub next


it's not agi until we have browser browsers automating atm machine machining machines, imo


Wes Anderson is positioning cinematographers on American soil with extremely powerful telephoto lenses, filming actors performing in meticulously designed miniature sets across the Canadian border. The film will be titled "The Asymmetrical Tax Avoidance" and will star Bill Murray as a customs agent with daddy issues.


i wouldn’t be surprised if many insults to human health are not relevant in population that exercises vigorously 5 times a week and have good body composition.

for the average american maybe we are looking for straws that break camels backs that are on the edge of breaking anyways


A more compact and beautiful relation exists between integers and finite rooted trees exist, imo.

David W. Matula found a correspondence between trees and integers using prime factorization, and reported it in 1968 in SIAM: "A Natural Rooted Tree Enumeration by Prime Factorization", SIAM Rev. 10, 1968, p.273 [1]

Others have commented on it before, search the web for Matula Numbers

I independently found this relation when working on a bar code system that was topologically robust to deformation. I wrote a document that explained this relation here[2].

I created an interactive javascript notebook that draws related topological diagrams for numbers. [3]

[1] http://williamsharkey.com/matulaSIAM.png

[2] https://williamsharkey.com/integer-tree-isomorphism.pdf

[3] https://williamsharkey.com/MatulaExplorer/MatulaExplorer.htm...


Sorry - I believe I am off topic as this is not relevant given:

"This indirectly enforces the idea that sets cannot have duplicate elements, as set membership is defined purely by the presence or absence of elements. For example:"

So there is a constraint on what sort of trees are allowed in this -forrest- which would preclude most finite rooted trees.


From [2]:

> EG: 165 = P5 * P3 * P1

Shouldn’t the last component be P2 (= 3)?


You are exactly correct - thank you for reading and letting me know, appreciate your curiosity!


I can intellectualize

But I cannot truly physically believe how much there is here in our universe.

It’s one thing to see zooming out animated diagrams

It’s a whole other thing to see these photos.

Imagine having a mind capable of holding every planet in every galaxy as familiar as we know our own.


The optimus bots seemed laggy. I thought the non verbal communication really suffered compared to a human using fingers and eye contact. The smoothness of the optimus movement was at odds with human movement - delicately but quickly darting around.

When a human makes eye contact with you and signals something with their hands - it is so responsive that you are certain that they are talking to you. With the robots, it was ambiguous.

Did someone put a low pass on the movements on top of a laggy remote control loop?


Is a fine not another way of saying - “no fair!- we want our cut!”


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: