HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | prinny_'s commentslogin

There is a world where approaches like HTTP 402 are implemented to monetize API usage.

Please get this token signed by our ad partner to enable your next ten requests.

The previous company I was working at had quite a lot of TCL code for their back end logic. Betting sector, well known in US and Europe. They still actively hire people to maintain the codebase. Rock solid code, no surprises, was able to handle tens of thousands of concurrent bets.

People in this thread hating on React seem to miss the crucial point that 2016 React was a godsend compared to just about every other option available. Vue only picked up steam quite later as React became more and more bloated or had its development forced by Vercel down a certain road. Angular was THE framework to avoid working on and people hated having to define multiple files for a simple component. The timing for React was just right back in the day.

Given how FEs are re-written every 7-10 years there is ample room for other frameworks to knock React off its throne, but before asking "but why not X" you also have to consider that organizations by now have almost a decade of experience building React apps and this plays a major role when deciding on which UI framework to rely on.


I believe we are having this discussion from a purely technical perspective and not from a business one. Let's take slack for example. Assuming a company can perfectly clone it, why would they? Yes they would skip paying for it, but they would have to maintain it, starting from its infrastructure all they way up to its UI. Will they think of new features? Will they follow industry developments in sound / streaming technology? Will they keep integrating other tools into it? I am sure they would rather pay to have somebody else do it for them, someone like slack itself.

Also, assuming a company has the capital to burn through enough tokens to create something so big and complex, why spend it on an internal tool? Shouldn't they be spinning slack-sized apps to expand their existing market share or try to disrupt new markets?


The way I see it using tmux to orchestrate multiple agents is an intermediate step until we get a UI that can be a product offering. Assuming we get orchestration to the level it has been touted, there is a world where tmux is unnecessary for the user. You would just type something to one panel in which the "overlord" agent is running (the "mayor" if we talking gas town lingo) and that agent will handle all the rest. I doubt jumping between panes is going to stick around as the product offering evolves.

Does it count if I share my experience with AI and nvim? I use it to update my configuration, discover new plugins, write custom lua code (I don't know lua) and inquire about motions that would help me in specific workflows. I started learning vim motions last summer and AI really lowered the entry barrier and allowed me to focus on the motions rather than the setup.

Also related to my nvim workflow but not strictly vim related: I use AI to write and update a bash script that handles tmux windows. Again, it lowered the barrier to entry and it made switching to nvim as my primary editor easier.


This is an incredibly cringe article. From using “wolf” in a completely forced way, to full quoting a conversation that seemingly only misses “and that testing framework’s name? Albert Einstein”.


Man I'm glad someone said this. Incredibly cringe and unnecessary using the whole wolf analogy for, essentially, "someone who's good at their job". Gives off vibes of the whole "alpha/high value male" thing going on in social media.


Exactly! I hate these stupid archetypes.


It's like a linkedin article that has escaped from its cage.


I have to admit reading heroic stories like these is a guilty pleasure of mine. It's ridiculous, but strangely inspiring in a completely unrealistic way.


I built a new pc for gaming 2 years ago with windows 11 and I can’t see myself using this OS again when I retire it. From randomly losing Bluetooth, to keyboard resets, to the hilarious failure that is the new right click menu (which lags a bit before appearing, something that I find hilarious) it’s just a bad user experience through and through. My new pc will either run Linux or be a Mac mini. Hopefully Linux gaming will continue to improve and I will be able to completely ditch windows once and for all.


I've been running Steam on both linux and windows. This year I was 85% Linux.


I also used to read my commute but stopped it after I finished "for whom the bell tolls". I was so moved that I ended up crying in the bus and I would have liked to experience that feeling in the privacy of my home rather in the morning bus with 9 hours still on the clock.


I used to religiously read The New Yorker (magazine) on my commute. I remember crying while reading about the copper mine rescue in Chile.


I read the road by Cormac McCarthy on the train. That was a mistake.


I can only hope that this degradation of UX will make more people switch or consider switching to other distributions. It's the only thing that will make microsoft listen.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: