Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | plufz's comments login

Technically…? Does anyone here believe that the EU and Europe is the same thing? Would you find it weird if someone said that a Norwegian company was in Europe?

Many people certainly seem to! And it annoys me. I wasn’t talking about the EU, though.

I was just commenting on the fact that in the UK, ‘Europe’ generally means ‘continental Europe’.

> Would you find it weird if someone said that a Norwegian company was in Europe?

I’d find it weird if a European did. But from Americans it’s to be expected.


> Would you find it weird if someone said that a Norwegian company was in Europe?

> I’d find it weird if a European did. But from Americans it’s to be expected.

Absolutely nothing weird about it, I'd find it very weird if they wouldn't. I'm from Europe and my social circle has people from all over Europe.

It's really just the UK which has this weird usage of Europe.


> I’d find it weird if a European did.

I have bad news. The UK is definitely in Europe both geographically and even more so historically and culturally. Norway is too by the way.

If you are offended by people referring to the UK as in Europe, my suggestion is both an history course and starting therapy.


I'd suggest you level up your reading comprehension before suggesting the parent poster was in any way offended or in need of therapy.

Parent is suggesting it would be weird for Europeans to call the UK as in Europe which as a European I can tell you is preposterous. That’s the kind of non sense you used to hear from Brexiter. They will have no sympathy from me.

Yeah… I’m a bit surprised.

No no no you missed it, clearly Americans are just stupid.

Which Americans, North or South?

If Norway isn’t in Europe where is it? Asia?

Well, Europe is a subcontinent of Asia. A bit like India or Arabia.

No?

Europe is a subcontinent of Eurasia, as is Asia. Probably not the naming scheme in all languages, but this is English


> I was just commenting on the fact that in the UK, ‘Europe’ generally means ‘continental Europe’.

It really depends on who you're speaking to.


And on the context

I think it is a little of both. I’m not American, but as a bystander it seems quite obvious that race is important in the US because of how important slavery has been in your culture (founding fathers, civil war, the history of your political parties, income distribution today, etc).

But I also have the impression that you have more knowledge of racism than some other countries. I mean the Dutch obviously have a horrific racist history.


What would be Amnesty’s agenda in feeding us propaganda about El Salvador?


Absolutely.

But I still think there is a difference with Bluesky and the other big social medias with full customization of how the feed(s) works, third party servers, custom labelers, etc. To me it seems plausible that they actually want to create more of an empowering tool that the users can control.

That will of course not stop users from using ”dumb” feeds. But the users doesn’t have the incitament of Facebook to always produce higher engagement and show more ads.

It is of course also troublesome that we do not know how Bluesky will act down the road to get their ROI.


By which metrics was Google+ successful? I don’t doubt you, I just never heard that before.


I can't say user metrics but Google Photos came out of Google+ and it is a massively successful product.

Hangouts (now Meet?) was also a product out of Google+ but considering GChat (the xmpp version) existed before, it was kind of a step backwards.

I think Google Local Guide also has some parts of Google+, not sure.


IMHO Google Photos was also just brand/infra-churn because it replaced Picasa Web Albums.


He does not critize you. He criticizes making reviews financed by affiliate links.


I made a review with affiliate links.


Can you not separate what you do from who you are? Are you defined as a person who makes reviews with affiliate links?


I agree that feelings are okay. But also the internet and society is so overloaded with emotional hyperboles. I like with HN that a lot of people make the effort to be bit more diplomatic, less aggressive and more based in facts than most online communities.


I find it very practical with small Bluetooth earbuds, but I agree on the consumption aspect of it. I really don’t like that I can’t change the batteries in my AirPods. I would even be semi-okay with having to hand in them to a technician for battery exchange, for a reasonable cost. But the current battery exchange for airpods is just another name for buying new earbuds. And the third party solutions that actually change the batteries cost about as much as new buds.


Why do you want a headphone jack? Not a rhetorical question, just genuine interest. Is it about audio quality, avoiding batteries or something else?

I would find it so cumbersome to use a cable on a handheld device nowdays. But different things for different people! :)


Not who you are replying to but my $30 wired Apple earbuds (came with my 6S) have outlived all of my co-workers half dozen $160 AirPods. That’s reason enough for a lot of people.


For $8.99 you can buy a high quality USB-C (or lightning) DAC with a 3.5mm output directly from Apple.

It's tiny and lightweight. I keep one in the back of my headphone case.


There are never enough USB-C ports.


You can buy Apples wired earbuds with the lightning connector for $18. Or the lightning to 3.5mm adapter (that’s what I have because I also still have my decade old original earbuds).


Yeah I agree, that is a very valid reason by itself.


My wired Shure in ear monitors have much better sound quality, and battery management on AirPods is pretty annoying. Even when they’re not running out mid-trip, it’s just unnecessary mental overhead to keep another thing charged.


For me it’s because

- I already have high quality earphones, same set for many years

- they don’t require charging

- audio quality is great

- they’ll work on any device with a 3.5mm jack, no proprietary lock-ins

- I have never lost a set of earphones and if I did replacement wouldn’t break the bank


I don't daily drive my phone for commuting anymore, but the trade-offs aren't exactly new: - battery frustrations - cost of a dozen cheap but good quality headphones vs a wireless equivalent - easier to lose wireless headsets when you put them down somewhere (wired too, but way cheaper so less big deal) - audio quality? Who knows

For people that demand noise cancelling, you need an active power source, but I personally hate noise cancellation and always turn them off. Maybe valuable in a plane with lots of engine noise.


Easier to store vs bulky charging case and charger and charger cable etc. The wired solution is more portable, believe it or not.


Simpler interface to debug and fix than bluetooth.


I have heard the argument that the standard nuclear plant have the inefficiencies of any large building project, like building a big bridge. You never get the optimizations of mass production that you get in a factory that produces tens of thousands of solar panels or lots of wind turbines. I guess that is what SMR is trying to solve. I don’t know how that is going.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: