Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ofabioroma's commentslogin

It’s basically a proxy that lives on top of OpenClaw on the network level. Very interesting.

Time to ipo

So that’s means we’re inside singularity?

A gravitational one? Every direction points down, toward the point of infinite slop.

Exactly. And I feel it gets even worse each new agent that gets released. Wanna test openclaw? Good luck exporting all of your contexts. What does your ai stack looks like? Are you still heavily using the web uis on your routine?

By UX you mean the chat interface? Or the lack of transparency of it? Or both?

This is WILD. And the fact everyone just accepts this fact makes it even worse. We’re relying our daily decisions on a closed chain of thought. Do you see this changing anytime soon?

I think in the end it all boils down to a trust issue on the big labs


Be skeptic of those telling you that technological advances are bad. They usually want something from you. And it’s usually your vote.

What political office do you believe Finnucane is running for?

Idk, but I think he left us with a pretty straightforward worldview

I think you’re right. In a very narrow, short term scope. That’s the issue.

The problem with this argument is that assumes the world is static. When trains were invented, they polluted a LOT. Technology evolved. Looking backwards, the amount of value unlocked by them outweighed by order of magnitude the short term pollution they generated. Inefficient in the short term. Generation changing over the longer horizon. Extend the timeframe of your argument. Do you think it holds 20 years from now when we have more efficient algorithms and energy generation technologies? I don’t think so.


Totally agree, but I would say that strategic thinking is easier for the wearer of the boot than the owner of the neck.

Said less calamitously (word?): while it’s important to be objective, objectivity is difficult when there are real existential risks.

Thank you for the frank discussion!


You're right. It's tricky. Essentially we want probabilistic systems to behave as deterministic ones. Do you see a light at the end of the tunnel?

Nope. But I am sceptic. Best I can see is that there is some somewhat useful cases in addition to more traditional stuff... And even then there will likely be lot of extra work for manual verification. And cost effectiveness is probably also a good question.

I think when oss catches up with opus-like capabilities, we’re talking

I think you got brainwashed dude

Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: