Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nostrapollo's commentslogin

First off, congrats on the launch! Construction is a tough market to build in. My personal view after being in it a for a few years is that there is no shortage of MVPs. In fact there is an MVP for every problem at every level (or at least it feels that way) but construction is /vast/ and the rough edges that seem juicy at first, in practice are optimizations rather than bottlenecks for constructors.

I hope you succeed because it would be great to have a standard API for this data, but I would advise on one of two directions: become the standard by being close to 100% accurate at finding symbols (one symbol doesn't seem to cut it in our testing) or make a great, comprehensive workflow for a small subset of the market and become standard that way.

In both cases, you cannot do a broad 'market test', you need to spend many hours with a specific sub-set of users in construction.

Disclaimer: I'm a co-founder of Provision.


I'll live on, posthumously


We're mirroring to Gitea + Jenkins.

It's definitely some extra devops time, but claude code makes it easy to get over the config hurdles.


Something sus about these posts that promote OpenClaw specifically, even on X when ClawdBot was first popping up - an unusual number of people were promoting it all without specific information on why it was useful. All the usual suspects were also promoting it (the 'dev influencer' accounts). Is this a new(?) tactic on hyping up a github repo for engagement?


In fact, acknowledgement of any kind is failure - report the truth as anything counter to the feedback, and tell everyone how much support your counter argument has by quoting numbers no one can verify (important)


73.24% of all statistics are made up on the spot.


They say sixty-five percent of all statistics / Are made up right there on the spot / Eighty-two-point-four percent of people believe 'em / Whether they're accurate statistics or not

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUK6zjtUj00


RIP Todd Snider. He was real.


Taken from the Donald Trump School of Leadership I'm sure :)


Also credit to Chris for creating this!


Personally a huge fan of Alfred, and was waiting for this integration since ChatGPT came out. It's very much an Alfred style plugin but great for the mini-prompts I use everyday.

Not affiliated with any of this, but love Alfred


Hard to tell from my phone but are there any sources for the ‘exodus’ numbers? I don’t get the same impression that this post is laying out.


Anecdotally I know exactly one person using Twitter to tweet and that's only because he shares some of those tweets to a Telegram channel. When he does I might check those messages on Twitter but I often don't.

All the messages I exchange with friends in WhatsApp groups are not happening inside Facebook groups and are diverting traffic from there. In the last many years FB has been a site I use to announce work events and to say thank you to happy birthday messages once per year. That's too be polite because my direct contacts say happy birthday to me on WhatsApp or in person.


I also know very few people who use Facebook, however a couple of degrees seperated from me, most people do. They all use Facebook Messenger (but just call it messenger). Other people a couple of degrees a different way use Twitter extensively.

On HN, we're in a bubble as we're people who give a shit about privacy and the companies running our social media. I'm fairly sure we're a tiny minority.


That's what I was looking for; starts with a popular conception, provides no evidence, then moves on to wish fulfillment.


It’s a vibe shift. The hard numbers may not be there (yet?), but the early signs are.

Facebook has been dead for years, unless you count instagram. Twitter never actually caught on with the normies. Gen Z is on TikTok.

In my friend groups everything that used to happen on Facebook now happens on private WhatsApp, iMessage, and Slack groups.


Vibe shift is just another term for a change in elite aspirant opinion. The vibe is localized to highly trend conscious social and professional milieus. These scenes are often regarded as a cultural vanguard, but are in fact often detached from the majority of the population, and are less harbingers of broad shifts in public opinion, and more simple reporters on their own microclimates. That is all to say, the hard numbers might not materialize for some time, if at all, and not for the reasons presently stated.


Even if a vibe shift is recognized it isn’t necessarily described so.

Looking at the earliest comments that include “tiktok” on this site, the product wove its way into mentions before some article blew it up.

That said if you were on the service when the boss walk was just breaking, and experienced the product’s progression (as a user) to Old Town Road, it was obvious something big was going on—before the numbers were there.


> Twitter never actually caught on with the normies.

Does not need to. That's where all journalists look for news. Normies then get their news from journalists. The circle is complete.


I agree. But a thriving social network that does not make.


A social network does not have to dominate the whole world to be useful and profitable.


That applies to all commerce really, but the SV philosophy is "growth like a cordyceps on meth", so...


It may be useful, but Twitter has not turned a profit for about four years.


I believe Musk is actively trying to change that. Whether he succeeds or not remains to be seen


I wonder what Musk's plan looks like. ~90% of Twitter's revenue comes from ads, and they are not doing too well since Musk took over. He may have to double down on non Western markets where large companies are still willing to work with him.


By adding -1B per year in interest rates? Interesting strategy!


Wasn’t it significantly profitable in 2019?


Facebook is still a thriving host of non-technical communities and classifieds. The features and experience across both of those use cases are constantly being degraded and are user-hostile, but FB is still winning.

Something in the vein of Discord will eventually replace FB groups, I think.

Classified is probably the service best protected by the most of FB’s network effect.


It's unreal to me how poor Facebook's actual product is. I regularly get white screens of death on the site, viewing a photo from the feed dumps the feed in the background forcing you to rescroll the whole page to get back where you were, account pages are little more than naked HTML... It's so shitty! Don't start me on how poor the business experience is either. Get locked out of an account or get flagged in error? Ha fuck you customer!

The only thing floating them is the network.


>It's unreal to me how poor Facebook's actual product is. I regularly get white screens of death on the site,...

I've wondered for a really long time how so many non-technical people could stand using Facebook; it always confused the hell out of me and was just awful to use.


I think non-technical people are ok with the abuse because everything on their computer abuses them. And if something goes awry, they figure it's their own fault for using their trackball mouse incorrectly [0].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackball


Nextdoor also has a local ads / classified ads section. I expect that would be the next destination for the FB Marketplace users (since they mostly fled Craigslist previously).


The problem for Nextdoor is that its active membership is even more skewed towards older folk than Facebook.


When your president has a social media profile and regularily uses it, then that particular platform is dead.


Doctorow is engaging in an awful lot of wishcasting here.


Isn't he always?


I think there’s fair reason to believe that VR is compelling, simply from personal experience the imagination runs wild the first time you try the quest or similar. Not sure why there’s so much confusion about the promise of meta vr. I cannot imagine a future where desk based workers aren’t using VR.


I’m assuming $1.89B doesn’t give them much though, if any power to influence


Since Twitter is now a private company, its owners are free of the host of laws that publicly traded firms have to abide by. There are many things the kingdom could offer Musk in return for a say in Twitter's content. Like money, in such form as personal bribes, donations to his foundation, tax breaks to open a SpaceX office in SA, etc.


That’s a good point, but they could have done that regardless of having ownership, no?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: