HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | neoromantique's commentslogin

Ask HN: How does one archive websites like this without being a d-ck?

I want to save this for offline use, but I think recursive wget is a bit poor manners, is there established way one should approach it, get it from archive somehow?


As long as you don't mirror daily and use rate limit there is no reason you would be a dick doing it.

FWIW I have a local copy of sheldown brown's website I mirrored a few years back when they announced the shop would close as I expected they would eventually shutdown the website too. I don't know if his wife is still alive, she had her own space nor if someone has taken over the maintenance.


A single user's one-off recursive wget seems fine? Browsers also support it iirc, individual pages at very least (and saved to the same place, the links will work).

No doubt it's already in many archive sites though, you could just fetch from them instead of the original?


I ask in more general sense, if there is a way to fetch this stuff directly from webarchive or something along those lines.

Gotta hit the search I feel :)


The Internet Archive probably has it already.

Yep, saved by ArchiveTeam a couple of years ago:

https://archive.fart.website/archivebot/viewer/?q=sheldonbro...


In the old-web days, I just used wget with slow pacing (and by "pacing" I mean: I don't need it to be done today or even this week, so if it takes a rather long time then that's fine. Slow helped keep me from mucking up the latency on my dial-up connection, too.)

I don't think that's being a dick for old-web sites that still exist today. Most of the information is text, the photos tend to be small, it's all generally static (ie, light-weight to serve), and the implicit intent is for people to use it.

But it's pretty slow-moving, so getting it from archive.org would probably suffice if being zero-impact is the goal.

(Or, you know: Just email the dude that runs it like it's 1998 again, say hi, and ask. In this particular instance, it's still being maintained.)


>Blaming DPRK's "economic mismanagement" while making no mention of the Western sanctions on DPRK which are the cause of its catastrophic economic and humanitarian situation

The catastrophic humanitarian situation IS the cause for the sanctions.


also the nukes. and shooting missiles over japan.

parent poster seems to want to ignore their decades of poor behavior and sheer brutality.

e.g. NK just executed people for watching squid game.


>First of all, the Guardian is known to be heavily biased again Musk.

Which is good, that is the sane position to take these days.


In some places that day is today, and has been for a while.

I agree but so far at all places I have ever worked, I have access to the local hardware, disk, etc... if that's an actuality it's extremely rare.

I've definitely witnessed some pretty big companies that have got all their employees, including developers, set up on Citrix. In those cases, the "foreign friendly legal environment getting rich off of it" was the United States

That is a position of privilege.

You can ignore politics, but at certain point, politics cease to ignore you.


Justifies? What a privileged position.

It is great shame that fascist US regime is the only real hope and ally of Persian people today, but it is what it is.

(Israel too, but Israel alone cannot do much).

(But I'm sure EU will send a strongly worded letter any day now)


I've been to the protest in Berlin, it's mostly Iranian diaspora there with all my "used-to-be-friends" that turned with Gaza stuff silent as ever.


>In fact, we believe - quite rightly - that if the US had conditioned military assistance to Israel on appropriate care for civilians, then the awful tragedy that unfolded in Gaza could have been averted.

What you saw in Gaza was ALREADY incredible levels of care and restraint (that has cost many Israeli soldiers their lives) to minimize civilian harm, when fighting against an enemy that benefits from increasing said harm.


I'll say it again and again till people wake up, this is the endgame of all religion. It doesn't matter which one, they all breed hate and encourage the othering of out-groups. This is why the middle east will never know peace while their governments are Theocratic.


>but they quickly decided (on their own) that it wasn't enough and they started invading

And the 6 Arab armies were just hanging around in there, yeah?


Daniel is also not an american


Why does that matter?


it doesn't I just read the gp comment wrong, my bad


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: