Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mavhc's commentslogin

Most of our thinking now is about how we made rocks think, gods, and fiction. None of those are created by evolution

Yes, we've managed to make our ancient hardware run more modern software but it's a bit of a kludge and causes compatibility issues.

Internet is way behind on democracy. In general everyone likes democracy until they're in charge, then they realise they're the best person to be in charge and the idiots who vote don't have a clue, and should probably be banned if not beheaded for speaking out of turn.

You'd have to weight votes by some kind of participation metric to solve the problem of very little authentication of the voters


The metric being house fires

1. subscribe to channels you like 2. only use the subscription tab

Or take it one step further:

  1. curate a list of creators you like on a local html page
  2. follow a link into YT
  3. refuse to log in to avoid Google keeping even more data on you
  4. run uBlock Origin on Firefox to avoid ads 
You still get recommendations and shorts, so you can still fall down rabbit holes, but they can also be used to find new creators to add to your list.

Once Starship has launched 1000 times without problems it'll be obviously safer despite having no abort system


Going to Mars takes about the same delta-v as the moon.

SpaceX launches 80% of the world's mass to orbit, they probably know what they're doing.

Starship is an extremely hard problem, and their aim is to reduce cost of getting mass to orbit by another 10x after Falcon 9 did the same.

Falcon 9 needs about 4% of fuel to land on a ship, 14% to return to launchpad

Why would you say they've had 100% failure rate? What did you think the reason was to launch and how did it fail?


Surely the could put a traditional upper stage on Super Heavy and just go directly to the moon, no? I’m not sure what the obsession with second stage reuse is, because you lose almost all your margin.


Falcon Heavy (as its name implies) is not capable as a super-heavy lift vehicle. Past GTO, it can only carry 18 tons. You need more than double that to reach the Moon and come back, as NASA did in the 1960s.


I'm not sure what the obsession with airplane reuse is. Why not just build a new one for each flight?


You don’t gain additional margin throwing away an airplane. Reuse is a lovely idea but the rocket equation is a harsh mistress.


Space X cares way more about reusability than the moon, they're not actually in a race to the moon. Step 1: build the best general solution. Step 2: do everything


You're confused. Elon said two weeks ago that they have given up on Mars and the Moon is the goal they're currently working on. He said it will probably take them another decade to catch up to NASA of the 1960s by reaching the Moon with a real super-heavy rocket that actually works.


He said moon first, not no Mars. And a decade to build a moon city, not to get there.

However what people say and their real reasons aren't always the same.

I assume Issacman went around to everyone and convinced them to say they're all switching on the moon, add another test flight to delay things, and in return they'll switch to using Starship in the future as they will cancel Block 1B of Artemis


You want to add a load of buttons? Should be easy enough, just get them to send codes to the computer via the network.

Door handles are harder, what do you want to change? Inner or outer?

What's insane about the charging port?


Great, who can I contact to get this done?

> What's insane about the charging port?

Well it doesn't work with most charging stations. Maybe it's different in the US.


Don't they use the same IEC 62196 ports as other EVs, outside the US?

They made their own in the US, because the standard SAE J1772 combo port is an unweildy behemoth, then they released the patent into public domain, and the rest of the automotive industry adopted their port into the NACS port, which beats both IEC 62196 and SAE J1772 in available power, all in a much smaller and easier-to-use connector.


Yeah the 62196-2 connector is standard in Europe. It's not legal to sell cars with a nacs connector and hasn't been for a long time.


> Great, who can I contact to get this done?

Here you go, add as many buttons, dials, knobs, and screens as you like for your Tesla...

https://www.enhauto.com/collections


They invented offices because the massive increase in productivity required more organisation than "I'll take it all to the market on Saturday"


Surely as soon as they're safer than humans they should be deployed as fast as possible to save some of the 3000 people who are killed by human drivers every day


Of course they should be, but that's not what will happen. Humans are not rational, so self-driving cars must be significantly safer than human drivers to avoid as much political pushback as possible.


Obviously the sane solution is to put a webcam inside your fridge


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: