Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ludwig's commentslogin

Where is the preorder page? :)


I've been using tmux for a while now, and it's a great tool. I hardly open any new terminal windows now.

If anyone is interested in the settings I've accumulated over the months, here is my config file: https://github.com/ludwig/dotfiles/blob/master/tmux.conf


Isn't ctrl-a the shortcut for beginning of line? i prefer ctrl-x


I remap Control-A that way also -- it's a holdover from my 'screen' days.


Use Chrome's incognito mode.


For what it's worth, here is my carefully crafted ~/.tmux.conf file. I was used to screen, so I carried most of the keybindings along when I switched to tmux.

https://github.com/ludwig/dotfiles/blob/master/tmux.conf


Graham's number is big, sure. But in a similar duel[1] between two MIT professors, they settled on this number: “The smallest number bigger than any number that can be named by an expression in the language of first order set-theory with less than a googol (10^100) symbols.” Try and beat that! :)

[1] http://tech.mit.edu/V126/N64/64largenumber.html


Per my comment above, Busy Beaver will pass that pretty quickly too, as again, a Busy Beaver contestant will rather early on simulate that entire problem (and BB has ready access to numbers like a mere googol). As large as that number is, I'd guess it's probably under BB(30), and certainly under BB(100) as I'd bet even a mere human could write a 100-state TM to simply simulate that answer.


Why? Perhaps I misunderstand something, but why can't I define a turing machine and the upper bound, and then BB with first order set theory. It is therefore my misunderstanding, that this gives me a lower bound of

BB( googol -n),

whith n the number of symbols I need to define BB.


The second interpretation of that quote is that beginners can also see/find things that experts would miss. Not surprisingly, that quote is from Suzuki's book "Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind"[1]. I view both interpretations as valid.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoshin


And beautifully, both interpretations are applicable to Steve. His early success with Apple could be attributed to a beginner's mind. Later, his ability to come back and rescue the company could only be the work of an expert.


Well said. Indeed (again in keeping with much of Zen), it is best to regard this quote as an observation without judgement.


Not long enough! I can't speak for anyone else, but you've eloquently described the main reason why I found Steve Jobs so inspiring. If you've read The Talent Code, I am definitely reminded of the chapters on Ignition, where the author Daniel Coyle writes about the conditions under which people are inspired and motivated.





Oooooooh! I get it now. According to this death-clock, my larger than small but smaller than medium company that is making very good money is a lifestyle company, like 37signals is. Actually, that's true! But do me a favor, don't tell anyone that. Please don't tell my hard-working and talented employees, for whom I am very grateful. Please don't tell my friends and siblings or my vendors. Let's just keep this between you and I. Thanks!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: