Hacker News .hnnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lokar's commentslogin

Or, some fraction of otherwise good/normal people who “win” are turned into sociopaths by the power and sycophancy.

The grift requires full commitment

IMO, the right thing to do is grandfather in any existing season ticket holders, if they ask. Have them go to a specific entrance where someone can check an ID and mark them off a list. Simple job for an intern or whatever.

I agree. He's one of some tiny number of people that all the staff will know on sight. Even printing a ticket for him is just a formality really.

He should have something to show staff inside, just in case

Using on animals is only phase 1 of his plan.

<private prison owners enter the chat>

i wish this was a joke, but i'd bet all the money i own that it is not


Well, the actual phrase came from an engineer.

Also, the executives 'retired' the official 'Don't be evil' slogan some time ago. I guess they didn't want to be limited. Seems fitting to the suits.

The finance people and mgmt consultants took over the company from the engineers a while ago.

I’m certain that if these clauses were banned, exactly zero contracts that would otherwise have been agreed would be abandoned. They are completely one sided, and superfluous to the goals of the contract.

> superfluous to the goals of the contract.

How so? The goal of these companies is generally to exercise the maximum possible control over what employees do and say.


Fair, the primary goal. An exchange of labor and expertise for pay.

I read it differently.

I agree the basic offer was probably sincerely from kindness. What seems creepy is her continued insistence, her inability to relate to the human in front of her.

I suspect she is just not used to anyone acting genuine towards her, let alone contradicting her. She always gets what she wants, even when it’s a whim.


I appreciate your nuanced reading.

Yes, it's possible that it came from a place of wanting to help.

And, after the offer was spurned, the kindness was immediately replaced with wrath, at "how dare she turn me down?"

So, both can be true: she can be kind and helpful, but also petty and vindictive, and unable to see other people's perspective. Being permanently surrounded by sycophants and yes-men/women will probably distort most people like that.


A tangent, but I’m interested (as an American) what is the German attitude towards laws that have no enforcement or penalty? Do most people feel an obligation to observe them? Is there any social cost for disregarding them?

I think it varies. I suspect in most common cases the lack of enforcement results from the rest of society not having an appetite to punish it. No harm done, no need to punish.

I believe jaywalking (or crossing a red light as a pedestrian) is prohibited, but you would have to do it in front of a really motivated cop (or cause an accident) to actually get a ticket for it. It is common and no one really cares - but if you were to do it in front of children or a school you will probably get disapproving looks or a somewhat stern talking to from others around you.

I think the image of the "order-loving german" is a bit of a stereotype. Some people overdo it (Calling the police for noise harassment if you still mow your lawn at 20:01), but they are generally not popular with their neighbors (or the police...)


Jaywalking is illegal is many jurisdictions, partly for pedestrians own safety, but also partly to shift the blame if a pedestrian is involved in an accident. So it’s mostly seen as a crime where people only hurt themselves.

jaywalking is illegal because the term jaywalking defines the illegal crossing of a street. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaywalking

legal jaywalking is by definition not possible. what is however possible and legal is crossing the street away from a marked crossing. at least in europe and in most places in the world except the united states.


They changed the law in CA, it's still technically illegal, but police are directed to not cite anyone unless:

"... a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of collision with a moving vehicle or other device moving exclusively by human power"

Turns out the police were mostly stopping non-white people for it


Any idea how the attitude compares to the Swiss?

IIRC there is actually a practice of nullifying laws that cannot be enforced (Vollzugsdefizit). One example I remember is that the enforcement of minor drug possession charges was declared unconstitutional because that law was only selectively enforced.

The population is very diverse about this I would say. Some people would stand at a red light as pedestrians until they starve to death while others don't give a fuck about anything.

Given where the plurality of readers of this site live (SF Bay Area), the inclusion of the coast redwoods cuts against your argument.

Or new infrastructure. You bring a demo of a new distributed transaction manager?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: