True. I feel like the main way a tool could differentiate from jq is having more intuitive syntax and many real world examples to show off the syntax.

For better or worse, Claude is my intuitive interface to jq. I don't use it frequently, and before I would have to look up the commands every time, and slowly iterate it down to what I needed.

The syntax makes perfect sense when you understand the semantics of the language.

Out of curiosity, have you read the jq manpage? The first 500 words explain more or less the entire language and how it works. Not the syntax or the functions, but what the language itself is/does. The rest follows fairly easily from that.

Steam runtime already gives developers a single target rather than having to support different distros individually.

If Steam Deck, the new Steam Machine etc take a significant part of market share, I think it will be more enticing for game developer to release a native version for Linux. Providing a native version should still be more robust and performant.

> still be more robust

Why? The only stable ABI on Linux is Win32.

Wow, that feels quite restrictive. "Classic for Git" would be allowed, but it doesn't quite have the same ring to it.

I have noticed this in GitHub issues too. Where many long paragraphs used to indicate high quality, now it's the opposite.

Yes, the more personal the context, the more the humanity aspect / being relatable matters.

To me the rhythm of the text makes it clear whether I'm reading something AI generated or not, usually.

Otherwise, not using em dashes, adding some mistakes and writing more like how you think/talk helps :)

Good on them. Platforms taking more than 10% feels unjustified and monopolish.

Did you ask it to make money?

Would love to hear from the human behind this AI stuff. What are you making and why?

As builders we should find pride in producing something beautiful. As the norm becomes more shitty, something nice becomes more refreshing.