Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | lazyant's comments login

I wouldn't call it abuse of trust but it's a bad idea to do a migration or any operation that can fail and cause downtime without warning the clients. Come Monday and no servers are online, what do you say, "oops, I tried to change something that didn't work"? that is fine only if they knew there was a migration over the weekend. On my end this situation would fireable offense or close to it.



I think we humans are not very good at guessing what would make us happy; you just need to try the real thing or as close as possible.


Stumbling on Happiness by Daniel Gilbert is a good read on this - it essentially covers many psychology experiments on happiness. I mean, overstates what the studies actually say and gets repetitive by the end as you might expect for this kind of book, but it’s interesting nonetheless and avoids becoming a self help or life philosophy book. The hedonic treadmill is very real.


Perhaps we could differentiate happiness and fulfillment? Climbing a mountain might not make you happy (who is happy when their feet hurt etc) but it might bring you satisfaction and fulfillment. Many things are like that, but not every thing that others find fulfilling will be a fit for you.


summary for the lazy: OVH


If the CLI runs on an engineer's laptop (like AWS CLI for ex) then it doesn't matter


It matters if you're paying for and managing the fleet of laptops


No.


Yes of course it does


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_cheese_model (kind of), pretty standard nowadays way in SRE to talk about root causes (plural) because usually it's more than one specific thing.


There's some serious academic critique of the Swiss Cheese model, too.

That said, I rather like it. It's straightforward to explain to people, they very quickly "get" it, and it gets them thinking along the right lines.


Not arguing with your point but see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Bamber_Bridge


They are fluff values with little actionability and the scrum/agile rituals seem unrelated to these anyways.


People with physical jobs should definitively be able to retire, a construction worker is not getting up a scaffold at 70.


Everyone in blue collar jobs knows the secret is to get into management or change fields before you start getting up there in years.


Maybe, but that’s not always feasible. Change fields? To what? Maybe teaching, but not every blue collar job can do that, let alone not every worker is capable. And not everyone is fit for management either, and for every manager there’s at least 10 workers under them, so there isn’t space for everyone. The ideal is to actually improve conditions, especially factors outside of the worker’s control, so as to allow them to have a proper retirement.


If only there were enough management jobs for everyone.


"plenty of people have pointed out that vintage scifi is full of rocketships but all the pilots are men. 1950s scifi shows 1950s society, but with robots. Meanwhile, the interstellar liners have paper tickets, that you queue up to buy. With fundamental technology change, we don't so much get our predictions wrong as make predictions about the wrong things. (And, of course, we now have neither trolleys nor personal gliders.) "

Yes, Asimov's Foundation has people smoking, reading physical newspapers and using physical money, lining up for customs when arriving to Trantor. No women until later on in the series (in his defense, he may have not talked to many women at the age he wrote the first novels).

There was movable sidewalks and other transportation devices though.


Yes, Asimov's Foundation has people smoking, reading physical newspapers and using physical money, lining up for customs when arriving to Trantor. No women until later on in the series (in his defense, he may have not talked to many women at the age he wrote the first novels).

The stories also have to be marketable to contemporary audiences. There may have been brilliant sci-fi at the time about strong, health-minded female protagonists, but I doubt it would have risen to popularity in 1950s society, and thus would have been forgotten.

You can see the effects today with some of the backlash against certain Disney IP.

I don't think sci-fi is a good predictor because of both the author's bias and society's (i.e. the The Market's) bias against topics that upset it.


A similar point can be made for the physical newspaper aspect; not every author is trying to impart accelerando-esque future shock on their readers. And presumably there isn't infinite market demand for that either. All different aspects of selection bias.


Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: