HN2new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kanbara's commentslogin

depth estimation is but one part of the problem— atmospheric and other conditions which blind optical visible spectrum sensors, lack of ambient (sunlight) and more. lidar simply outperforms (performs at all?) in these conditions. and provides hardware back distance maps, not software calculated estimation

Lidar fails worse than cameras in nearly all those conditions. There are plenty of videos of Tesla's vision-only approach seeing obstacles far before a human possibly could in all those conditions on real customer cars. Many are on the old hardware with far worse cameras

Interesting, got any links? Sounds completely unbelievable, eyes are far superior to the shitty cameras Tesla has on their cars.

There's a misconception that what people see and what the camera sees is similar. Not true at all. One day when it's raining or foggy, have some record the driving, through the windshield. You'll be very surprised. Even what the camera displays on the screen isn't what it's actually "seeing".

Yea.. not holding my breath on links to superman tesla cameras performing better than eyes

it’s not a difficult strategy to come up with, tbh. tech companies do this sort of thing all the time.


iOS did exactly this and it’s so much better for usage


how does it add confusion?

if normal people don’t know, criminals/terrorists do, and the materials are commonplace but not screened for, then everything about the current approach is wrong.

and when has a plane been brought down by the evil explosives or stable liquids in recent memory?

so the theatre put in place is just that, huh?


"american" viewpoints aka fascism and naziism and the promotion of white supremacist views. it will take so much time to undo this mess.


as if straight / white causes in most western nations aren't "pushed" by default.

it's ok to know that gay people exist and that christianity is not the be-all-end-all of cultural practices.


[flagged]


> how and when to introduce them to the less savoury aspects of the world

In this situation, what do you consider the less savory aspects of the world?


Nazis are bad because they deny other people’s freedom to exist.

That LGBTQ flag doesn’t say straight people are wrong or shouldn’t exist. Literally all it’s saying is that people are welcome to exist publicly as their true selves. The odds are high that those kids know someone who falls under that umbrella, and this is an age appropriate way to say that’s okay just as straight people’s mating habits are discussed at the level of “mommy and daddy loved each other so much they got married and had you”.


god forbid we teach children that people are different, and they matter, and they can love who they want and practice what religion they want. the horrors!

i hope your kids turn out cishet for their sake and only date white folk, otherwise they're going to be in for a bad time. what's so bad about caring for other people and respecting others?


you can't see how asking for a hint and formulating using your own brain is totally different than telling the AI to code the entire thing for you?


I've never vibe coded. You could ask AI a question in the same way you'd ask a friend (what if you don't have friends?) I guess my point is there is a difference between using AI and overusing AI.


if YOU make a claim, you need to provide proof. simple as. anything else is a logical fallacy or malicious argument :)


This whole conversation with measurablefunc has been like seeing somebody get asked for a dollar, loudly yelling “And get a job?!” and then spending an hour trying to convince everyone in the room that they’re Bruce Wayne. I love this website.

Edit: or like seeing somebody get asked for a cookie and then saying “And go to the store? And buy sugar? And eggs? And flour? And drive home and bake them?! Hell no!” and then saying “obviously that meant I have a ton of cookies in my house right now”


You are welcome to follow the relevant the links & reach your own conclusions.


no, actually that requires congressional approval, and the government is currently shut down, mostly as a way to defer the release of the Epstein files. nice try, though.


> mostly as a way to defer the release of the Epstein file

How many disappointments will it take for people to realize there isn't any more there there than what's already been found?

Or are the Epstein files are going to be what the minority party rambles about from now on instead of having a coherent message?


Should be quite simple to release them and move on then, that will be great.


But then they can't release them at a convenient time to distract from something much bigger. Which I'm afraid they will, eventually.


> there isn't any more there there than what's already been found?

I thought this until seeing Trump look completely guilty every time it comes up, and the GOP leadership mobilizing to stop the release of the files.


Democrats could have released yhem already. It would have been bipartisan. They didn't, because there's nothing there and it was better politics to let fringe Republicans obsess about it.


Democrats were bound by laws. Trump made his whole personality about breaking them.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: